When a personal injury case reaches resolution, most claimants assume the outcome is a single lump-sum payment. That is one option. Another is a structured settlement, an arrangement in which the compensation is paid out over time through a series of periodic payments rather than all at once. For some claimants, particularly those with long-term care needs or concerns about managing a large sum of money, this arrangement deserves serious consideration before any final decision is made.
The Payment Structure Matters as Much as the Amount
Our friends at Joseph Law Group, LLC discuss this with clients who are approaching settlement in cases involving significant compensation: the form in which you receive your recovery is a financial and legal decision with consequences that extend for years, and it should be evaluated as carefully as the settlement figure itself. A industrial accidents lawyer may be able to help you pursue the full compensation available in your case and advise on whether a lump-sum payment, a structured settlement, or a combination of the two best serves your specific circumstances and long-term needs.
Getting the number right is the first step. Getting the structure right is the second.
How a Structured Settlement Works
In a structured settlement, the defendant or their insurer funds a stream of future payments to the claimant rather than delivering a single immediate payment. This is typically accomplished through the purchase of an annuity from a life insurance company, which then makes the scheduled payments directly to the claimant according to the agreed terms.
The payment schedule is negotiated as part of the overall settlement. It can be customized in a variety of ways to meet the claimant’s specific needs, including:
- Regular monthly or annual payments over a defined period or for the duration of the claimant’s life
- A lump-sum payment at settlement combined with periodic future payments
- Larger payments at defined intervals to address anticipated future expenses, such as medical procedures or educational costs
- Payments designed to begin at a future date, such as when a child reaches adulthood or when anticipated care needs increase
- Escalating payments over time to account for inflation and rising medical costs
Once the annuity is funded and the structured settlement agreement is finalized, the payment schedule is generally fixed and cannot be modified in response to changed circumstances. That permanence is both a feature and a limitation that claimants must fully understand before agreeing to the arrangement.
The Tax Advantages of Structured Settlements
One of the most significant practical advantages of a structured settlement is its tax treatment. Under federal law, personal injury settlement proceeds received to compensate for physical injuries or physical sickness are generally excluded from taxable income. This exclusion applies to both lump-sum and structured settlement payments in qualifying cases.
The investment earnings that accumulate within the annuity funding a structured settlement are also excluded from taxation in most circumstances, which distinguishes a structured settlement from a lump sum that is invested and generates taxable returns.
For reference on how the IRS treats personal injury settlement proceeds and the applicable tax exclusions, the Internal Revenue Service provides guidance on the tax treatment of compensation received for physical injuries and illness.
Your attorney and, ideally, an independent financial advisor should both weigh in on the tax implications of any proposed settlement structure before you agree to its terms.
When a Structured Settlement Makes the Most Sense
Structured settlements are not appropriate for every claimant or every case. They tend to serve the client’s interests most directly in specific circumstances:
Cases involving minors, where a structured payment plan can deliver funds when the recipient is old enough to manage them responsibly and where court approval of the settlement will already involve judicial oversight of how funds are handled.
Cases with long-term or permanent medical needs, where periodic payments can be aligned with anticipated treatment costs and care expenses over the claimant’s lifetime.
Cases involving claimants who have concerns about managing or preserving a large lump sum, whether due to existing financial pressures, family circumstances, or other considerations.
Cases where the tax-free compounding within the annuity produces a meaningfully higher total payout than the after-tax return on an equivalent invested lump sum.
When a Lump Sum May Be Preferable
A lump-sum payment provides immediate access to the full recovery and the flexibility to direct it as the claimant sees fit. For claimants with existing debt obligations, immediate financial needs, business interests, or a clear plan for how a significant sum will be managed, the lump sum may serve them better than a structured arrangement.
Structured settlements also carry some risks worth understanding. The annuity is only as secure as the issuing insurance company. And once established, the structure generally cannot be modified if the claimant’s circumstances change, a significant loss of flexibility that must be weighed against the benefits.
The Role of a Settlement Planner
In cases involving structured settlements, claimants benefit from working with a qualified settlement planner, a professional who can model different payment scenarios, assess the financial strength of potential annuity providers, and help the claimant understand the long-term financial implications of each option.
Your attorney can facilitate the introduction to a qualified settlement planner and will work alongside them to coordinate the legal and financial dimensions of the arrangement. The decision should not rest on legal advice alone or financial advice alone, but on an integrated understanding of both.
Contact Our Office to Discuss Your Options
If your personal injury case is approaching resolution and you want to understand how a structured settlement compares to a lump-sum payment and what arrangement may best serve your long-term interests, speaking with an attorney is the right starting point for that conversation. Contact our office to schedule a time to discuss your situation and what your settlement options may realistically involve.
Car Accident - Suffered a TBI
Jury Verdict - Injury in Bunionectomy Surgery
Truck Accident - Suffered a TBI in Semi Collision
Wrongful Death - 20 Year Old in Car Accident
Jury Verdict - Car Accident - Multiple Surgeries
Wrongful Death - Trip & Fall in a Restaurant
Wrongful Death - In Medical Malpractice Case
Medical Malpractice Settlement
Car Accident - Injured in T-Bone Accident
Slip & Fall - Jury Verdict
Car Accident - Jury Trial
"I would highly recommend Jason Ausman and his team. Jason was extremely helpful during the settlement of my case and his support team also was great to work with."
"So much compassion and patience from everyone at this firm. I’m incredibly thankful for their dedication to my case and making sure I received the best outcome possible. Thank you!"
“Michelle Dreesen and her firm Ausman Law were very professional, caring and provided outstanding guidance with our case. Totally recommend her and her firm.”
“A professional, knowledgeable and dedicated team. Ausman Law managed my case and advocated for me exceeding my expectations! Thank you Ausman Law!”
“Jason and his team are very smart professional and personable.. easy to work with and make you feel comfortable working with them.. definitely the law firm you want in your corner!”
"Jason and his staff are the best! I was always made to feel like I was a priority when speaking with Jason or one of the wonderful ladies in his office. It was an awesome client experience and I will definitely call them again when I need a good attorney!"
"Matt and Ann took on a very difficult case. They care!! They definitely worked hard and never gave up!! Much appreciated."